Four voice actors needed to help produce dialogues for classroom materials. Date:Thursday 15th (9am – 3pm), or Sunday 18th September (11am – 5pm, may be flexible), or Sunday 25th September (11am to 5pm). Location: Nanzan University. Role: Voice actors. Pay: ¥5,000 to ¥8,000 (depending on skills). Transportation fee: Maximum (about) ¥500 each way. Others: Additional work may be required in 2017. Voice actors will need to sign an industry standard talent release form (available only in English).
Applicants Age: 18 to about 29 Gender: 2 Males & 2 females. Preferred: one male and one female native speakers (of any region), and one male Korean and one female Chinese speakers of English with very good or near native-like pronunciation (the female Chinese speaker can be from China, Hong Kong, Macao, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, etc). English skills: Very good to native-like pronunciation. Other skills: Voice acting skills, especially able to use a range of emotions. Other info: Preferred: people who are likely to stay in Nagoya for more than a year for additional work. May need to meet for a brief interview and script reading on Friday 9th Sept, or Thursday 15th Sept. Contact me for details of application including what voice sample files are required for application.
Deadline: Applications accepted until positions are filled. Contact Andrew Blyth via the email address here to apply and for more information.
I will be presenting a workshop titled “Using Bottom-Up Approaches to Teach Listening” at the annual Japan Association of Language Teachers (JALT) conference in November this year. I encourage you to come along, or ask questions online (via Twitter is best). Official details:
Presentation ID #: 619 Presentation Title: Using Bottom-Up Approaches to Teach Listening Format: Practice-Oriented Short Workshop Content Area: Listening (LIS) Context: College & University Education
Handouts / resources:
(to be added later)
Often teachers teach listening by playing a CD and providing students with comprehension questions; though this is not teaching listening but testing it (Sheerin, 1987). Also, recent academic discussion has criticised the inadequacy of listening strategies (see Blyth, 2012; and Chang and Millet, 2014). Consequently, new methodologies were developed by the presenter to actually teach listening using bottom-up approaches based on cognitive science theory by Cutler (2012) and Field (2008). This practice oriented workshop introduces these new teaching methodologies which are the outcomes of a large scale mixed methods research project. This project worked with teachers in central Japan to develop and trial methodologies for bottom-up listening approaches that are suitable for their context (considering teaching preferences, class types, and students). Data collection included pre and post listening tests, as well as interviews with teachers and students. A key result is that bottom-up listening approaches, or teaching pronunciation, is an effective means to improve student listening abilities. This workshop will provide only a brief introduction to pertinent listening theory followed by demonstrations of simple activities that teachers can use from Monday morning. The workshop will include demonstrations, audience participation, and a short Q&A. Handouts will include web links to class handouts, audio samples, demonstration videos, and other related materials.
I have taught with top-ranked and low-ranked universities in Japan. I have taught the best and worst of students. I have taught in five different countries in Europe, Australasia, and the Far East. I have taught for all of this century so far, and so I have noticed some differences between successful and unsuccessful students. Here is a list of differences I have seen; a list you could learn from.
Ask questions. If they don’t know, they can’t learn, or they can’t complete a task.
Have colours. Their pencil case has many different coloured pens and highlighters. They all the main stationary supplies with them.
They have the book, or a copy of the book. Even if they didn’t buy the textbook, or forgot it, they still bring their own photocopy to class.
Are organised. They plan and organise their schedules so they have time to do homework, do assignments, and study. They are almost never late with submitting work. If there is a problem, they ask for help.
Don’t have or don’t overdo part-time work. They focus on their university success. So they rarely come to class sleepy or exhausted.
Stress is a normal part of life. Having too much and too little is damaging. We need to have a work-life balance to live normally. This means we need about a third (⅓) of the day work, ⅓ play (family & friends), and ⅓ sleep. If this balance is different, then you will have problems managing stress. This presentation is a brief introduction to stress and how to manage it. This presentation was given at the annual meeting of Aichi Gogaku Volunteers on the 18th June 2016.
What is stress? Selye was a famous psychologist who studied stress. He said:
“Nowadays, everyone seems to be talking about stress. You hear it not only in daily conversation, but also through television, radio, the newspapers and the constantly increasing number of conferences, stress centres, and university courses that are devoted to the topic… The businessman thinks of it as frustration or emotional tension, the air traffic controller as a problem in concentration, the biochemist and endocrinologist as a purely chemical event, the athlete as muscular tension. This list could be extended to almost every human experience or activity, and somewhat surprisingly, most people… think of their own occupation as being the most stressful. Similarly, most of us believe that ours is “the age of stress”, forgetting that the caveman’s fear of being attacked by wild animals while he slept, or dying from hunger, cold, or exhaustion, must have been just as stressful as our fear of a world war, the crash of the stock exchange, overpopulation or the unpredictability of the future.”
– Hans Selye (1907 – 1983, cited in Walker, Burnham, & Borland, 1994, p704).
Walker, M., Burnham, D., & Borland, R. (1994) Psychology, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Japan has long been criticised for its poor education system, where there is an emphasis not on learning, but on passing tests. The purpose of education is to give knowledge and skills to people for their future. A British educator here in Nagoya notes that his university students lack general knowledge about the world. They might have passed tests, but still lack intellectual abilities required for academic success (McLellan, Japan Times, 2016). Education does not mean the sole ability to pass tests; it means the ability to think, learn, and adapt to a future we cannot imagine (Robinson, TED, 2006). Consequently, the Global Teacher Prize, the Nobel Prize equivalent in education, has criticised Japan for its rote learning culture (Japan Times, 2016). A quick search on the Japan Times website reveals years of criticism, but with no change in sight (Japan Times, Search).
I would bet that most Japanese people would wonder why this photo above was included in this post. It would seem irrelevant, but I assure you it is exactly the right photo to include.
Ultimately, students themselves are responsible for their learning, however, they still need guidance on what is appropriate and what is not. Here the responsibility of the teacher is to provide appropriate means for students to learn. In a sense, the job title, “teacher”, is antiquated. Perhaps titles like “learning facilitator” or “mentor”, or anything similar is more appropriate. The term “teacher” implies that one person stands at the front of the room talking, and students do nothing but listen; however, this does mean that students learn. This manner of instruction is called lecturing, and it is one of the worst or most ineffective forms of learning for students. Instead, students should be active, involved, and collaborating, hence the term “learning facilitator”. The concept of facilitating student learning is not new, and I did not invent it. The idea traces its origins to Lev Vygotsky, probably the father of education psychology, who realised that near-peer and collaborative learning is the most effective form of learning.
What do I do in my classes? I give students reading materials that act as knowledge input. Students are given thinking and communication skills, and then they discuss the articles they read. That is to say, students do the reading, thinking, discussing, and learning. I provide the input and impetus. If students want to learn, they will. If students do not want to, they wont. However, the social environment in my classes makes it impossible for students to avoid participating and learning. It is a system that seems to work well, especially as students learn more about the world, and their communicative abilities improve a lot.
Welcome to all new and returning students. I hope you have a great year, and I wish you the best. If you have any problems or questions, please ask. Without asking, you don’t learn. Please visit this blog monthly for interesting updates, especially watch my Twitter feed near exam times.
The dispute between Apple and the FBI has come to a conclusion. The FBI wanted to break into the San Bernadino gunman’s phone, but couldn’t because of Apple’s protection system. The FBI demanded that Apple break it open, or create a “backdoor”. Numerous privacy advocates immediately saw just how horrible the FBI request was and launched into an international campaign to stop to stop the FBI (EFF, Fight for the Future, Freedom of the Press, HuffingtonPost, SaveSecurity). The problems were that if one person could break into an iPhone, then every single iPhone can also be hacked. Since every single iPhone shares the same security features, all iPhones are now vulnerable. The BBC news has announced that the FBI got a private Isreali company to find a way to break into iPhones (BBC, Fight for the Future).
The FBI claimed that only they will have access to this technology and method of getting into iPhones, so we should trust them. This is still wrong-headed thinking. It is still true that now all iPhones are vulnerable, and now there are threats to our security (EFF, NYTimes, Vice). Now repressive governments know two things: It is ok to intrude on people’s privacy, and that iPhones can be broken into. Criminals now know two things: iPhones can be broken into, and it took a security company a week or so to do it. Security companies know two things, iPhones can be broken into, and governments (and criminals) are willing to pay.
Being able to break into an iPhone has major repercussions. Firstly, the FBI, other government organisations, rogue individuals with authorised access behaving improperly, and criminals, can access everything. That means, your emails, photos, iCloud, your contacts list, your calendar, your social media accounts (Twitter, FaceBook, Google+, etc), all of your apps, and more. If they can access your email, they can change your email access and social media passwords, locking you out. Your whole digital life can be either hijacked or deleted. The flip side is, it’s also now possible for police to plant evidence on your digital life. Police do act illegally, which is why there are internal affairs units set up to catch police acting badly. Also, repressive governments can act against human rights (BBC), including targeting and jailing people who oppose an unpopular government action. Criticism of the Abe administration has already had a few Japanese journalists fired.
May be not today or tomorrow, unless Apple upgrades their iPhone security immediately there will be two major problems. Firstly, the prospects of sales of the new, yet to be released, iPhone SE is now in jeopardy. The phone itself seems amazing, and I really needed to upgrade, and this was probably it. However now, I’ve been creeped out by the FBI’s actions, and so I won’t be buying one. How much loss of revenue will Apple suffer in the short term now? Secondly, who will want to buy an iPhone or iMac in the future now that trust in Apple and the American government isn’t just tarnished, but destroyed?